當前位置：希尼爾首頁 > 翻譯新聞 > 
		

	 公司中標上市公司國際招標翻譯工作
              
	
              
	
              
	
		
              
									公司中標上市公司國際招標翻譯工作
              
	              
		
              
			
              
				編輯：青島希尼爾翻譯公司
				發(fā)布時間：2019-05-27
			
              
	
              
	
               
              
	
              
	公司今日再次中標國內鋼鐵上市公司翻譯招標，在10余家翻譯公司中脫穎而出，獲得客戶的充分認可，現(xiàn)將評標標準摘錄如下，看看公司是如何獲得高分的。
              
	
              評標委員會對通過技術評議的投標人進行綜合評分步驟，即：商務評價、服務評價?技術評價?價格評價。Bids which are validated in technical review shall be subject to the following comprehensive scoring procedures: commercial review, service review, technical review and price review.
              
	
              投標人綜合得分=商務評議（權重10%）+服務評議（權重10%）＋技術評議得分（權重40%）＋價格評議得分（權重40%）
具體評價標準見附件1、2、3、4。
Comprehensive score = Commercial review (weighting 10%) + 
	service review (weighting 10%) + technical review (weighting 40%) + price 
	review (weighting 40%).  
              
	
              
	附件1、商務評價表（權重10%）
              
	
              
		
              
			
			
              序號
              
			              		
			
			
              內  
			容
              
			              		
			
			
              標準分
              
			              		
			
			
              投標人名稱
              
			              		
		
              
		
              
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
		
              
		
              
			
			
              1
              
			              		
			
			
              業(yè)績（共40分，根據下列標準評分）
              
			
              自2004年1月1日起至開標日的國內鋼鐵廠1780mm以上的生產線及以上同類工程業(yè)績
              
			              		
			
			
              40分
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
		
              
		
              
			
			
              最低分為0分，最高分為40分
              
			
              
			提供整套生產線技術業(yè)績最多者為滿分，其余按照名次得分，得分值以幾何級數(shù)遞減，最后名次為0分。
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
		
              
		
              
			
			
              2
              
			              		
			
			
              付款條件及方式：付款條件最優(yōu)者得滿分，次優(yōu)者滿分基礎上減2分，第三優(yōu)者在滿分的基礎上減4分，以此類推。
              
			
              
			符合招標文件要求的付款條件和方式，得最高評價值。在此基礎上，將按照招標文件中規(guī)定的利率計算提前支付所付的利息（及招標人可能增加的風險），并按照投標資料表的規(guī)定，依據利息值多少降低評價值。
              
			              		
			
			
              20分
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
		
              
		
              
			
			
              3
              
			              		
			
			
              近五年來企業(yè)狀況、正在執(zhí)行合同情況及履約能力。（投標書中要有資料支持）
              
			              		
			
			
              由評標委員會成員獨立對投標人該項評價內容進行排序（排序序號為從“1”開始的正整數(shù)，排序第一名，序號“1”；排序第二名，序號為“2”，以此類推）；然后將該項的排序序號平均值由小到大進行排列，排列第一位得：20分，第二位得：
			10分，第三位及以后名次得0分。
              
			              		
			
			
              20
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
		
              
		
              
			
			
              4
              
			              		
			
			
              合作承諾、項目執(zhí)行措施
              
			              		
			
			
              20
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
		
              
	
              
	
              
	              
	
              Appendix 1: 
	Commercial Evaluation Table (weighing 10%)
              
	
              
		
              
			
			
              No.
              
			              		
			
			
              Contents
              
			              		
			
			
              Standard score
              
			              		
			
			
              Name of 
			bidder
              
			              		
		
              
		
              
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
		
              
		
              
			
			
              1
              
			              		
			
			
              Performance (full score 
			40, the scoring shall be based on the following standard)
              
			
              From January 1, 2004 to 
			the bid opening date, domestic steel plant has production line more 
			than 1780mm and more superior engineering performance 
			
              
			              		
			
			
              40 
			
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
		
              
		
              
			
			
              The lowest score is 0 and 
			highest score is 40
              
			
              The bidder who may provide 
			the complete production line shall have the full score in technical 
			performance. The score of other bidders shall be given according to 
			the ranking. The score shall decrease geometrically and the score of 
			the last place shall be 0. 
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
		
              
		
              
			
			
              2
              
			              		
			
			
              Payment conditions and mode: 
			The bidder who offers the optimal payment conditions shall get the 
			full score. The one in the second place shall get a score which is 2 
			points less than the full score, the one in the third place shall 
			get a score which is 4 points less than the full score and 
			accordingly. 
              
			
              The bidder who offers 
			payment conditions and mode in full compliance with provisions of 
			the Tender Document shall get the full score. On this basis, the 
			interest (together with possible more risks on the part of the 
			Tenderee) to be paid in advance shall be determined using the 
			interest rate specified in the Tender Document. The evaluation value 
			shall be decreased according to the interest value and in accordance 
			with provisions of the table on biding materials. 
			
              
			              		
			
			
              20 
			
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
		
              
		
              
			
			
              3
              
			              		
			
			
              Corporate conditions of last 
			five years, contracts under performance and performance capacity. 
			(these shall be supported by materials given together with the bid)
              
			              		
			
			
              Each member of the committee 
			shall independently sort the bidders in respect of this evaluation 
			content (the ranking number shall be a whole number starting from 
			“1”. The one ranked first shall be numbered “1”, the one ranked 
			second shall be numbered “2” and accordingly). The average of 
			ranking numbers shall be sorted in an ascending order. The one 
			ranked first shall get a score of 20, the one ranked second shall 
			get a score of 10 and the one ranked third and subsequent places 
			shall get a score of 0. 
              
			              		
			
			
              20
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
		
              
		
              
			
			
              4
              
			              		
			
			
              Cooperation commitments and 
			project implementation measures 
              
			              		
			
			
              20
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
			
			
               
              
			              		
		
              
	
              
	
               
              
	
              附件3、服務評價表（權重10%）
              
	
              
		
              
			
				
              
					
					
              序號
              
					              		
					
					
              項目
              
					              		
					
					
              標準分
              
					              		
					
					
              分項項目
              
					              		
					
					
              分項標準分
              
					              		
					
					
              說明
              
					              		
				
              
			              
			
              
				
				
              1
              
				              		
				
				
              圖紙資料供應
              
				              		
				
				
              40
              
				              		
				
				
              資料的齊全程度
              
				              		
				
				
              17
              
				              		
				
				
              由評標委員會成員獨立對投標人該項評價內容進行排序（排序序號為從“1”開始的正整數(shù)，排序第一名，序號“1”；排序第二名，序號為“2”，以此類推）；然后將該項的排序序號平均值由小到大進行排列，排列第一位得：17分，第二位得：10分，第三位3分，其他名次得0分。
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              資料的內容深度
              
				              		
				
				
              17
              
				              		
				
				
              由評標委員會成員獨立對投標人該項評價內容進行排序（排序序號為從“1”開始的正整數(shù)，排序第一名，序號“1”；排序第二名，序號為“2”，以此類推）；然后將該項的排序序號平均值由小到大進行排列，排列第一位得：17分，第二位得：10分，第三位3分，其他名次得0分。
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              參考圖紙資料的數(shù)量
              
				              		
				
				
              6
              
				              		
				
				
              由評標委員會成員獨立對投標人該項評價內容進行排序（排序序號為從“1”開始的正整數(shù)，排序第一名，序號“1”；排序第二名，序號為“2”，以此類推）；然后將該項的排序序號平均值由小到大進行排列，排列第一位得：6分，第二位得：3分，第三位1分，其他名次得0分。
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              2
              
				              		
				
				
              人員派遣
              
				              		
				
				
              30
              
				              		
				
				
              設計各階段人員派遣的合理性，滿足設計結合要求
              
				              		
				
				
              10
              
				              		
				
				
              由評標委員會成員獨立對投標人該項評價內容進行排序（排序序號為從“1”開始的正整數(shù)，排序第一名，序號“1”；排序第二名，序號為“2”，以此類推）；然后將該項的排序序號平均值由小到大進行排列，排列第一位得：10分，第二位得：5分，第三位1分，其他名次得0分。
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              合作制造階段人員派遣的合理性，滿足設備監(jiān)制要求
              
				              		
				
				
              5
              
				              		
				
				
              由評標委員會成員獨立對投標人該項評價內容進行排序（排序序號為從“1”開始的正整數(shù)，排序第一名，序號“1”；排序第二名，序號為“2”，以此類推）；然后將該項的排序序號平均值由小到大進行排列，排列第一位得：5分，第二位得：3分，第三位1分，其他名次得0分。
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              現(xiàn)場安裝、調試階段人員派遣的合理性，滿足設備安裝調試要求
              
				              		
				
				
              15
              
				              		
				
				
              由評標委員會成員獨立對投標人該項評價內容進行排序（排序序號為從“1”開始的正整數(shù)，排序第一名，序號“1”；排序第二名，序號為“2”，以此類推）；然后將該項的排序序號平均值由小到大進行排列，排列第一位得：15分，第二位得：10分，第三位5分，其他名次得0分。
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              3
              
				              		
				
				
              人員培訓
              
				              		
				
				
              20
              
				              		
				
				
              理論培訓
              
				              		
				
				
              6
              
				              		
				
				
              由評標委員會成員獨立對投標人該項評價內容進行排序（排序序號為從“1”開始的正整數(shù)，排序第一名，序號“1”；排序第二名，序號為“2”，以此類推）；然后將該項的排序序號平均值由小到大進行排列，排列第一位得：6分，第二位得：3分，第三位1分，其他名次得0分。
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              業(yè)績工廠培訓
              
				              		
				
				
              6
              
				              		
				
				
              由評標委員會成員獨立對投標人該項評價內容進行排序（排序序號為從“1”開始的正整數(shù)，排序第一名，序號“1”；排序第二名，序號為“2”，以此類推）；然后將該項的排序序號平均值由小到大進行排列，排列第一位得：6分，第二位得：3分，第三位1分，其他名次得0分。
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              現(xiàn)場培訓
              
				              		
				
				
              8
              
				              		
				
				
              由評標委員會成員獨立對投標人該項評價內容進行排序（排序序號為從“1”開始的正整數(shù)，排序第一名，序號“1”；排序第二名，序號為“2”，以此類推）；然后將該項的排序序號平均值由小到大進行排列，排列第一位得：8分，第二位得：4分，第三位1分，其他名次得0分。
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              4
              
				              		
				
				
              備件提供
              
				              		
				
				
              10
              
				              		
				
				
              提供的一年備件清單的完整性、合理性
              
				              		
				
				
              5
              
				              		
				
				
              由評標委員會成員獨立對投標人該項評價內容進行排序（排序序號為從“1”開始的正整數(shù)，排序第一名，序號“1”；排序第二名，序號為“2”，以此類推）；然后將該項的排序序號平均值由小到大進行排列，排列第一位得：5分，第二位得：3分，第三位1分，其他名次得0分。
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              提供的調試備件清單的完整性、合理性
              
				              		
				
				
              5
              
				              		
				
				
              由評標委員會成員獨立對投標人該項評價內容進行排序（排序序號為從“1”開始的正整數(shù)，排序第一名，序號“1”；排序第二名，序號為“2”，以此類推）；然后將該項的排序序號平均值由小到大進行排列，排列第一位得：5分，第二位得：3分，第三位1分，其他名次得0分。
              
				              		
			
              
		
              
	
              
	
              Appendix 3: 
	Service Evaluation Table (weighing 10%)
              
	
              
		
              
			
				
              
					
					
              No.
              
					              		
					
					
              Items
              
					              		
					
					
              
					Standard score
              
					              		
					
					
              
					Sub-items
              
					              		
					
					
              
					Standard score of sub-items
              
					              		
					
					
              
					Descriptions
              
					              		
				
              
			              
			
              
				
				
              1
              
				              		
				
				
              Supply of 
				drawings 
              
				              		
				
				
              40
              
				              		
				
				
              Completeness of 
				materials 
              
				              		
				
				
              17
              
				              		
				
				
              Each member of the 
				committee shall independently sort the bidders in respect of 
				this evaluation content (the ranking number shall be a whole 
				number starting from “1”. The one ranked first shall be numbered 
				“1”, the one ranked second shall be numbered “2” and 
				accordingly). The average of ranking numbers shall be sorted in 
				an ascending order. The one ranked first shall get a score of 
				17, the one ranked second shall get a score of 10, the one 
				ranked third shall get a score of 3 and subsequent places shall 
				get a score of 0. 
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              Depth of contents of 
				materials 
              
				              		
				
				
              17
              
				              		
				
				
              Each member of the 
				committee shall independently sort the bidders in respect of 
				this evaluation content (the ranking number shall be a whole 
				number starting from “1”. The one ranked first shall be numbered 
				“1”, the one ranked second shall be numbered “2” and 
				accordingly). The average of ranking numbers shall be sorted in 
				an ascending order. The one ranked first shall get a score of 
				17, the one ranked second shall get a score of 10, the one 
				ranked third shall get a score of 3 and subsequent places shall 
				get a score of 0. 
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              Quantity of drawings for 
				reference 
              
				              		
				
				
              6
              
				              		
				
				
              Each member of the 
				committee shall independently sort the bidders in respect of 
				this evaluation content (the ranking number shall be a whole 
				number starting from “1”. The one ranked first shall be numbered 
				“1”, the one ranked second shall be numbered “2” and 
				accordingly). The average of ranking numbers shall be sorted in 
				an ascending order. The one ranked first shall get a score of 6, 
				the one ranked second shall get a score of 3, the one ranked 
				third shall get a score of 1 and subsequent places shall get a 
				score of 0. 
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              2
              
				              		
				
				
              Dispatch 
				of personnel 
              
				              		
				
				
              30
              
				              		
				
				
              Rationality in personnel 
				dispatch during each design stage, meeting design needs 
				
              
				              		
				
				
              10
              
				              		
				
				
              Each member of the 
				committee shall independently sort the bidders in respect of 
				this evaluation content (the ranking number shall be a whole 
				number starting from “1”. The one ranked first shall be numbered 
				“1”, the one ranked second shall be numbered “2” and 
				accordingly). The average of ranking numbers shall be sorted in 
				an ascending order. The one ranked first shall get a score of 
				10, the one ranked second shall get a score of 5, the one ranked 
				third shall get a score of 1 and subsequent places shall get a 
				score of 0. 
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              Rationality in personnel 
				dispatch during cooperative manufacturing stage, meeting 
				equipment manufacturing supervision requirements 
				
              
				              		
				
				
              5
              
				              		
				
				
              Each member of the 
				committee shall independently sort the bidders in respect of 
				this evaluation content (the ranking number shall be a whole 
				number starting from “1”. The one ranked first shall be numbered 
				“1”, the one ranked second shall be numbered “2” and 
				accordingly). The average of ranking numbers shall be sorted in 
				an ascending order. The one ranked first shall get a score of 5, 
				the one ranked second shall get a score of 3, the one ranked 
				third shall get a score of 1 and subsequent places shall get a 
				score of 0. 
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              Rationality in personnel 
				dispatch during on-site installation and commissioning stage, 
				meeting equipment installation & commissioning requirements 
				
              
				              		
				
				
              15
              
				              		
				
				
              Each member of the 
				committee shall independently sort the bidders in respect of 
				this evaluation content (the ranking number shall be a whole 
				number starting from “1”. The one ranked first shall be numbered 
				“1”, the one ranked second shall be numbered “2” and 
				accordingly). The average of ranking numbers shall be sorted in 
				an ascending order. The one ranked first shall get a score of 
				15, the one ranked second shall get a score of 10, the one 
				ranked third shall get a score of 5 and subsequent places shall 
				get a score of 0. 
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              3
              
				              		
				
				
              Training 
				of personnel 
              
				              		
				
				
              20
              
				              		
				
				
              Theoretical training
              
				              		
				
				
              6
              
				              		
				
				
              Each member of the 
				committee shall independently sort the bidders in respect of 
				this evaluation content (the ranking number shall be a whole 
				number starting from “1”. The one ranked first shall be numbered 
				“1”, the one ranked second shall be numbered “2” and 
				accordingly). The average of ranking numbers shall be sorted in 
				an ascending order. The one ranked first shall get a score of 6, 
				the one ranked second shall get a score of 3, the one ranked 
				third shall get a score of 1 and subsequent places shall get a 
				score of 0. 
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              Plant training on 
				performances 
              
				              		
				
				
              6
              
				              		
				
				
              Each member of the 
				committee shall independently sort the bidders in respect of 
				this evaluation content (the ranking number shall be a whole 
				number starting from “1”. The one ranked first shall be numbered 
				“1”, the one ranked second shall be numbered “2” and 
				accordingly). The average of ranking numbers shall be sorted in 
				an ascending order. The one ranked first shall get a score of 6, 
				the one ranked second shall get a score of 3, the one ranked 
				third shall get a score of 1 and subsequent places shall get a 
				score of 0. 
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              On-site training 
				
              
				              		
				
				
              8
              
				              		
				
				
              Each member of the 
				committee shall independently sort the bidders in respect of 
				this evaluation content (the ranking number shall be a whole 
				number starting from “1”. The one ranked first shall be numbered 
				“1”, the one ranked second shall be numbered “2” and 
				accordingly). The average of ranking numbers shall be sorted in 
				an ascending order. The one ranked first shall get a score of 8, 
				the one ranked second shall get a score of 4, the one ranked 
				third shall get a score of 1 and subsequent places shall get a 
				score of 0. 
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              4
              
				              		
				
				
              Supply of 
				spare parts 
              
				              		
				
				
              10
              
				              		
				
				
              Completeness and 
				rationality of list of spare parts for use for one year
              
				              		
				
				
              5
              
				              		
				
				
              Each member of the 
				committee shall independently sort the bidders in respect of 
				this evaluation content (the ranking number shall be a whole 
				number starting from “1”. The one ranked first shall be numbered 
				“1”, the one ranked second shall be numbered “2” and 
				accordingly). The average of ranking numbers shall be sorted in 
				an ascending order. The one ranked first shall get a score of 5, 
				the one ranked second shall get a score of 3, the one ranked 
				third shall get a score of 1 and subsequent places shall get a 
				score of 0. 
              
				              		
			
              
			
              
				
				
              Completeness and 
				rationality of list of spare parts for equipment commissioning 
				
              
				              		
				
				
              5
              
				              		
				
				
              Each member of the 
				committee shall independently sort the bidders in respect of 
				this evaluation content (the ranking number shall be a whole 
				number starting from “1”. The one ranked first shall be numbered 
				“1”, the one ranked second shall be numbered “2” and 
				accordingly). The average of ranking numbers shall be sorted in 
				an ascending order. The one ranked first shall get a score of 5, 
				the one ranked second shall get a score of 3, the one ranked 
				third shall get a score of 1 and subsequent places shall get a 
				score of 0. 
              
				              		
			
              
		
              
	
              
	
               
              

              
	
              
來源：青島希尼爾翻譯公司http://www.marshallsfreshproduce.com，轉載請注明出處
              
	
              
公司中標上市公司國際招標翻譯工作